Ecological and coenotic analysis of flora in the territorial Kremenchug reservoir area
Main Article Content
Abstract
Introduction. The construction of Kremenchug reservoir deals to the flooding of surrounding areas, the 75% of primary natural landscapes of the Dnieper floodplain was completely transformed, and their floristic diversity undergone significant in some cases irreplaceable loss. On the territory of the former Dnieper valley within the Kremenchug reservoir changed after its completing the flora of wetland and meadow that have reduced their area to 80% and 60%.
Purpose. Making eco-coenotic analysis of flora in Kremenchug reservoir area for the results of floristic studies conducted over the years 2008-2013.
Results. Flora of vascular plants of the reservoir area has 659 species. The leading role in the flora species occupy mesophyt group consisting of 221 species. The hyhrophyt group has 155 species which are dominated by species of meadow and marsh, they are common in lowland areas of low and temporarily flooded geocomplex. The xeromezophyt group has 121 species. The mezoxerophyt group includes 96 species. The xerophyt group includes 29 species.
Leading position in relation to the lighting conditions, takes a geliophyt group – 322 species and sciogeliophyt – 195, that indicates the predominance of ecotypes with high illumination. The geliosciophyt group has 121 species. The part of sciophyt is relatively small and has 21 species.
Flora reservoir has eight eco-cenotic groups. The greatest number of species are meadow (103) and marsh (92) eco- cenotic groups. Forest eco-coenotic group includes 45 species. Meadow steppe eco-coenotic group includes 81 species. The real water and air-water eco-coenotic group represented respectively (31) and (33) species. Psamophyt eco-coenotic group is represented by 23 species. Synanthropic eco-coenotic group includes 251 species, that is much higher than the flora of Ukraine.
Conclusion. Ecological and coenotic analysis shows the species’ predominance of meadow, marsh, water and air-water group, indicating the meso-gihrophyt nature of flora in the reservoir territory. A significant part of synanthropic species reflects the state of the secondary anthropogenic disturbance of ecotypes. The territorial distribution of eco-cenotic groups testifies to their uneven distribution on the reservoir territory. At the top of the part the largest areas occupied by real water, air-water and marsh ecological and coenotic group. In the middle of the part they are little less, that is associated with a geocomplex area decrease in which they apply. At the bottom of the part there are meadow and marsh groups, which almost completely absent and the lowest, compared with other parts, is the real water and air-water group.
Article Details
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
AGREEMENT ABOUT TRANSMISSION OF COPYRIGHT
I, the author of the article / We, the authors of the manuscript _______________________________________________________________________
in case of its acceptance for publication, we transfer the following rights to the founders and editorial boards of the scientific publication "Cherkasy University Bulletin: Biological Sciences Series":
1. Publication of this article in Ukrainian (English) and distribution of its printed version.
2. Dissemination of the electronic version of the article through any electronic means (placing on the official journal web site, in electronic databases, repositories, etc.). At the same time we reserve the right without consent of the editorial board and the founders:
1. Use the materials of the article in whole or in part for educational purposes.
2. To use the materials of the article in whole or in part for writing your own theses.
3. Use article materials to prepare Summarys, conference reports, and oral presentations.
4. Post electronic copies of the article (including the final electronic version downloaded from the journal's official website) to:
a. personal web-pecypcax of all authors (web sites, web pages, blogs, etc.);
b. web-pecypcax of the institutions where the authors work (including electronic institutional repositories);
with. non-profit, open-source web-pecypcax (such as arXiv.org).
With this agreement, we also certify that the submitted manuscript meets the following criteria:
1. Does not contain calls for violence, incitement of racial or ethnic enmity, which are disturbing, threatening, shameful, libelous, cruel, indecent, vulgar, etc.
2. Does not infringe the copyrights and intellectual property rights of others or organizations; contains all the references to the cited authors and / or publications envisaged by applicable copyright law, as well as the results and facts used in the article by other authors or organizations.
3. It has not been previously published in other publishers and has not been published in other publications.
4. Does not include materials that are not subject to publication in the open press, in accordance with applicable law.
____________________ ___________________
First name, Last name, signature of the author
"___" __________ 20__
References
Zerov, D.C. (1924). By the flora districts of Cherkasy, Cherkasy and Chigirinsky counties. Bulletin of Kiev Botanic Garden, 1, 15-26 (in Ukr.)
Konohray, V.A., Rasevich, V.V., Osipenko V. (2011). Analysis flora territory Kremenchug reservoir. Ukrainian Botanical Journal, 4, 509-517 (in Ukr.)
Bajrak A. (1997) Abstract flora Dnieper left bank. Vascular plants. Poltava: Nesting (in Ukr.)
Svirenko, D.A. (1938). Dnieper Reservoir. Water macrophytes. - Dnipropetrovsk. Bulletin Dnieper hydrobiological station; 3, 179 p (in Ukr.)
Korelyakova, I. L. (1997). Vegetation Kremenchug reservoir K .: Science. оpinion (in Ukr.)
Didukh, J.P., Gelyuta P.G. (1994). Fitoindikatsiya environmental factors. K .: Science. Opinion. (in Ukr.)
Halchenko, N.P. (2006). Regional landscape park "Kremenchuk smooth." Flora. K .: Fitosotsiotsentr, (Protected areas Ukraine. Flora. Vol. 5). (in Ukr.)
Gomlja L.M. (2004). Valley vbulletin vegetation and its floristic and sozological features: Author. Thesis. for obtaining the candidate. Biol. Sciences specials. 03.00.05. Kyiv. (in Ukr.)
Bohovin, A.V. (1996). Ecological and biological analysis of vegetation of floodplain meadows Dnieper in terms antropopresiyi. Ukrainian phytocoenotic collection. Coll. Avg. S. 1 (15), 93-100. (in Ukr.)
Solomaha, V.A. (1982). Meadows p. Vorskla. Ukrainian Botanical Journal. 39, 30-35. (in Ukr.)
Protopopova, V.V. (1991). Synantropnaya Ukraine and flora ee path of development. K .: Science. opinion. (in Ukr.)