ENTROPY OF BEHAVIORAL REACTIONS AND FUNCTIONAL ORGANIZATION OF THE CENTRAL NERVOUS SYSTEM

Main Article Content

Юрій Петренко
Владислав Северинчук

Abstract

Introduction. Sensorimotor reactions to repeated stimuli are not independent; reaction time possesses an internal structure formed under the influence of attention, neurodynamic stability, and cognitive load. Therefore, time series can be viewed as dynamic systems where healthy physiological systems demonstrate "organized complexity". A decrease in complexity—moving toward excessive regularity or excessive chaos–is seen as a sign of reduced functional adaptability. In light of the theory of dissipative structures, entropy can be considered an indicator of the dynamic balance between stability and the adaptive restructuring of functional systems.
The purpose of the study was to investigate the possibility of using entropy analysis of simple sensorimotor reaction time to study the functional state of the central nervous system
Methods. The study was conducted at Bohdan Khmelnytsky National University of Cherkasy with 80 participants aged 17 to 75. Simple visual-motor reaction time was determined using the Makarenko method. Data preprocessing included removing reactions outside the 100–700 ms range and applying the Median Absolute Deviation (MAD) method to eliminate statistical outliers. Entropy was calculated based on discrete Shannon entropy applied to reaction time distribution histograms, with RT values grouped into intervals using Sturges' rule.
Results. It was found that as age increases, the average reaction time grows, but changes in variability are more significant. The coefficient of variation and interpercentile range (P90–P10) demonstrate an expansion of the value range and increased instability, especially in the 61–75 age group. Entropy values also increased with age, from 2.285 bits in the 17–18 group to 2.543 bits in the 61–75 group. Analysis revealed no functional dependence between entropy and mean reaction time or coefficient of variation, confirming that entropy reflects unique characteristics of distribution related to structural uncertainty. Generalized age dynamics show that while all metrics (Mean RT, CV, P90-P10, Entropy) increase with age, entropy demonstrates the most consistent and monotonic growth.
Originality. For the first time, an integral approach combining classical statistical metrics with Shannon entropy was applied to sensorimotor reaction time series across a wide age range to quantify the degree of organization of the central nervous system. The study demonstrates that entropy serves as an independent indicator of the "organized complexity" of behavioral responses that classical statistics cannot fully capture.
Conclusion. The introduction of entropy analysis allows for a deeper assessment of the functional state of the CNS beyond simple speed metrics. Age-related changes in sensorimotor reactions manifest not only as slowing but as a decrease in the stability and organization of the reaction process. Increased entropy in older age groups indicates higher uncertainty and reduced order in the functioning of the sensorimotor system, reflecting a decline in functional organization.

Article Details

How to Cite
Петренко, Ю., & Северинчук, В. (2026). ENTROPY OF BEHAVIORAL REACTIONS AND FUNCTIONAL ORGANIZATION OF THE CENTRAL NERVOUS SYSTEM. Cherkasy University Bulletin: Biological Sciences Series, (1), 70–80. https://doi.org/10.31651/2076-5835-2018-1-2026-1-70-80
Section
Статті

References

Іванець О. Б., Буриченко М. Ю., Архирей М. В., Братко В. Ю. Особливості використання методів нелінійної динаміки для обробки біомедичних даних // Наукоємні технології. – 2022. – № 4(56). DOI: https://doi.org/10.18372/2310-5461.56.17131

Попадинець О.О., Гоженко А.І., Бадюк Н.С., Попович І.Л. Індивідуальні особливості ентропії параметрів нервових регуляторних структур (ЕЕГ/ВРС). VIII Національний конгрес патофізіологів України “Патологічна фізіологія - охороні здоров’я України” (Одеса, 13-15 травня 2020 р). Одеса; 2020: 312-314.

Brown J. W., Mendes N., Heathcote A., McKinnon R., Seli P. (2017). Hick–Hyman law is mediated by the cognitive control network in the brain. Scientific Reports. Vol. 7. Article 16104. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-16104-3

Fitousi D. (2023). Quantifying entropy in response times (RT) distributions using the cumulative residual entropy (CRE) function. Entropy. Vol. 25, No 8. Article 1239. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/e25081239

Goldberger A. L. (1996). Non-linear dynamics for clinicians: chaos theory, fractals, and complexity at the bedside. The Lancet. Vol. 347, No 9011. Pp. 1312–1314. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(96)90948-4

Iglesias-Martínez M. E., Candela-Riera G., Hernández-Wilches C. (2020). Machinery failure approach and spectral analysis to study the reaction time dynamics over consecutive visual stimuli: an entropy-based model. Mathematics. Vol. 8, No 11. Article 1979. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/math8111979

Ilya Prigogine – Facts. Nobel Prize in Chemistry 1977: “for his contributions to non-equilibrium thermodynamics, particularly the theory of dissipative structures”. [Електронний ресурс]. – NobelPrize.org. – Режим доступу: https://www.nobelprize.org/prizes/chemistry/1977/prigogine/facts/ (Accessed: 23.02.2026).

Keshmiri S. (2020). Entropy and the Brain: An Overview. Entropy. Vol. 22, No 9. Art. 917. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/e22090917

Lipsitz L. A., Goldberger A. L. (1992). Loss of complexity and aging. JAMA. Vol. 267, No 13. Pp. 1806–1809. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.1992.03480130122036

Pincus S. M. (1991). Approximate entropy as a measure of system complexity. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA. Vol. 88. Pp. 2297–2301

Richman J. S., Moorman J. R. (2000). Physiological time-series analysis using approximate entropy and sample entropy. American Journal of Physiology – Heart and Circulatory Physiology. Vol. 278. Pp. H2039–H2049

Shannon C. E. (1948). A Mathematical Theory of Communication. Bell System Technical Journal. Vol. 27. Pp. 379–423, 623–656. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1538-7305.1948.tb01338.x