INTERACTION BETWEEN MOTOR AND COGNITIVE BRAIN SYSTEMS IN PERSONS WITH HEARING DEPRIVATION
Main Article Content
Abstract
Abstract. The peculiarities of the functional interaction of motor and cognitive systems were investigated in 27 persons with hearing loss aged 17-18, and 24 peers with normal hearing function, under the condition of visual information processing in the go/go and go/no-go paradigm. The cognitive task in the go/no-go paradigm included determining the modality of the signal, the shape of the figure, the semantic meaning of the word, and a quick reaction (go) or inhibition of the motor act (no-go). The task in the go/go paradigm involved a rapid motor response to signals of different modalities.
The speed characteristics of the visual response to verbal signals in the go/no-go paradigm depended on the state of auditory function. The response time to words in the go/no-go paradigm for individuals with hearing deprivation was statistically significantly longer, and the speed characteristics were lower than those with normal sensory function (p = 0.031). According to the speed of performance of the task in the go/no-go paradigm for verbal signals, a level of functional interaction of motor and cognitive systems (r = 0.66; р = 0.043) was higher in young people with hearing loss, than in persons with normal hearing (r = 0.38; p = 0.046).
The functional interaction of motor and cognitive systems, as well as the speed of task performance depended on the choice of the information processing mode. The speed of performance of the task for the go/go paradigm was higher in subjects with deprivation (p = 0.026) and normal auditory function (p = 0.041) than in the go/no-go paradigm. It was established that the functional interaction of the motor and cognitive systems of the brain during information processing in the go/no-go paradigm depends on the modality of the signals. For young people with derivation of auditory function in the go/no-go paradigm, the time characteristics of performing tasks for pictorial signals were statistically significantly higher than for verbal signals (p = 0.028), and for individuals with normal auditory function, such differences were (p = 0.036).
It has been proven that the functional interaction of the motor and cognitive systems of the brain depends on the complexity of the presented information, the modality of the signals, and the state of the sensory function. In case of dysfunction of the auditory system, the visual system is compensatory activated, and the intra- and intersystem functional interaction of the motor and cognitive systems of the brain is strengthened. A hypothesis is proposed, and the issue of the participation of distinct cross-modal mechanisms of functional interaction of cognitive and motor systems of brain activity for persons with auditory function deprivation under the condition of visual information processing in the go/no-go paradigm is discussed.
Article Details
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
AGREEMENT ABOUT TRANSMISSION OF COPYRIGHT
I, the author of the article / We, the authors of the manuscript _______________________________________________________________________
in case of its acceptance for publication, we transfer the following rights to the founders and editorial boards of the scientific publication "Cherkasy University Bulletin: Biological Sciences Series":
1. Publication of this article in Ukrainian (English) and distribution of its printed version.
2. Dissemination of the electronic version of the article through any electronic means (placing on the official journal web site, in electronic databases, repositories, etc.). At the same time we reserve the right without consent of the editorial board and the founders:
1. Use the materials of the article in whole or in part for educational purposes.
2. To use the materials of the article in whole or in part for writing your own theses.
3. Use article materials to prepare Summarys, conference reports, and oral presentations.
4. Post electronic copies of the article (including the final electronic version downloaded from the journal's official website) to:
a. personal web-pecypcax of all authors (web sites, web pages, blogs, etc.);
b. web-pecypcax of the institutions where the authors work (including electronic institutional repositories);
with. non-profit, open-source web-pecypcax (such as arXiv.org).
With this agreement, we also certify that the submitted manuscript meets the following criteria:
1. Does not contain calls for violence, incitement of racial or ethnic enmity, which are disturbing, threatening, shameful, libelous, cruel, indecent, vulgar, etc.
2. Does not infringe the copyrights and intellectual property rights of others or organizations; contains all the references to the cited authors and / or publications envisaged by applicable copyright law, as well as the results and facts used in the article by other authors or organizations.
3. It has not been previously published in other publishers and has not been published in other publications.
4. Does not include materials that are not subject to publication in the open press, in accordance with applicable law.
____________________ ___________________
First name, Last name, signature of the author
"___" __________ 20__
References
Rissardo, J. P., Caprara, A. L. F., & Prado, A. L. C. 2017. Projeto Semana Nacional do Cérebro: uma proposta neurocientífica. Experiência, Santa Maria, UFSM, 3(1), 86-100. doi:10.5902/2447115122193. ISSN 2447-1151.
Ohsumi, Y. 2016. The Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine 2016. Stockholm, Sweden: The Nobel Assembly at Karolinska Institute.
Edelman, G. M., & Gally, J. A. 2001. Degeneracy and complexity in biological systems. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 98(24), 13763-13768. doi:10.1073/pnas.231499798
Penrose, R., Genzel, R., & Ghez, A. 2020. The Nobel Prize in Physics 2020.
Zhavoronkova, L. A., Zharikova, A. V., Kushnir, E. M., Mikhalkova, A. A., & Kuptsova, S. B. 2011. Characteristics of EEG reactivity changes during the performance of dual tasks in healthy subjects (voluntary postural control and calculation). Human Physiology, 37(6), 688-699. doi: 10.1134/S0362119711060168
Moser, E. I., & Moser, M. B. 2011. Seeing into the future. Nature, 469(7330), 303-304.
Shpenkov O., Tukaev S., Zima I. 2018. Changes in brain activity in the gamma range during listening to rock music with a reduced level of low frequencies. Bulletin of Taras Shevchenko Kyiv National University. Biology. 1 (75): 27-32.
Lyzohub, V. S., Chernenko, N. P., Kozhemiako, T. V., Palabiyik, А. А., & Bezkopylna, S. V. 2019. Age peculiarities of interaction of motor and cognitive brain systems while processing information of different modality and complexity. Regulatory Mechanisms in Biosystems, 10(3), 288-294. doi:10.15421/021944
Kotsan, I. Y., Kozachuk, N. O., Kuznetsov, I. P., & Poruchynskii, A. I. 2016. Indices of coherence of EEG rhythms in the course of cognitive activity as markers of creative thinking: gender specificity. Neurophysiology, 48(4), 277-286.
Morenko, A. G., & Korzhik, O. V. 2016. Brain processes in women with different modal alpha-frequency through the execution of manual movements with applying of force. Ukrainian Journal of Ecology, 6(1), 326-341.
Lyzohub, V., Kozhemiako, T., Palabiyik, A., Khomenko, S., & Bezkopylna, S. 2020. Processing information in the go/nogo/go paradigm: interactions between cognitive function and the autonomic nervous system. Health Problems of Civilization, 14(1), 53-62. doi.org/10.5114/hpc.2020.93294.
Bondarenko, M. P., Bondarenko, O. V., Kravchenko, V. I., & Makarchuk, N. Y. 2016. EEG activity in dextrals and sinistrals during visual monocular/binocular perception of verbal emotionally colored information. Neurophysiology, 48, 43-53.
Verbruggen, F., & Logan, G. D. 2008. Automatic and controlled response inhibition: associative learning in the go/no-go and stop-signal paradigms. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 137(4), 649. https://doi: 10.1037/a0013170
Lyzohub, V., Chernenko, N., Palabiyik, A. 2019. Neurophysiological mechanisms of regulation of sensorimotor reactions of differentiation in ontogenesis. Journal of Cellular Neuroscience and Oxidative Stress. 11 (1), 805-814.
Doumas, M., Rapp, M. A., & Krampe, R. T. 2009. Working memory and postural control: adult age differences in potential for improvement, task priority, and dual tasking. Journals of Gerontology: Series B, 64(2), 193-201. doi:10.1093/geronb/gbp009.
Silsupadol, P., Shumway-Cook, A., Lugade, V., van Donkelaar, P., Chou, L. S., Mayr, U., & Woollacott, M. H. 2009. Effects of single-task versus dual-task training on balance performance in older adults: a double-blind, randomized controlled trial. Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation, 90(3), 381-387.
O'Shea, S., Morris, M. E., & Iansek, R. 2002. Dual task interference during gait in people with Parkinson disease: effects of motor versus cognitive secondary tasks. Physical therapy, 82(9), 888-897.
Mohammadirad, S., Salavati, M., Takamjani, I. E., Akhbari, B., Sherafat, S., Mazaheri, M., & Negahban, H. 2012. Intra and intersession reliability of a postural control protocol in athletes with and without anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a dual‐task paradigm. International journal of sports physical therapy, 7(6), 627.
Laufer, Y., Ashkenazi, T., & Josman, N. 2008. The effects of a concurrent cognitive task on the postural control of young children with and without developmental coordination disorder. Gait & posture, 27(2), 347-351.
Butler, J. 2013. Excitable speech: A politics of the performative. Routledge, 200.
Lyzogub, V. S., Makarenko, M. V., Yukhymenko, L. I., Khomenko, S. M., Koval, Yu. V., & Kozhemyako, T. V. 2015. The age dynamic of sensomotor function of people with heart deprivation. Science and Education a New Dimension. Natural and Technical Sciences, III(5), Issue: 41, 20-24.
Gougoux, F., Zatorre, R. J., Lassonde, M., Voss, P., & Lepore, F. 2005. A functional neuroimaging study of sound localization: visual cortex activity predicts performance in early-blind individuals. PLoS biology, 3(2), e27, 0324-0333.
Klinge, C., Röder, B., & Büchel, C. 2010. Increased amygdala activation to emotional auditory stimuli in the blind. Brain, 133(6), 1729-1736.
Yokoyama, O., Miura, N., Watanabe, J., Takemoto, A., Uchida, S., Sugiura, M., ... & Nakamura, K. 2010. Right frontopolar cortex activity correlates with reliability of retrospective rating of confidence in short-term recognition memory performance. Neuroscience research, 68(3), 199-206.
Voss, P., & Zatorre, R. J. 2012. Occipital cortical thickness predicts performance on pitch and musical tasks in blind individuals. Cerebral Cortex, 22(11), 2455-2465.
Luria, V., Krawchuk, D., Jessell, T. M., Laufer, E., & Kania, A. (2008). Specification of motor axon trajectory by ephrin-B: EphB signaling: symmetrical control of axonal patterning in the developing limb. Neuron, 60(6), 1039-1053.
Filimonova, N. B., Makarchuk, M. Yu., Zima, I. G., Kalnysh, V. V., Cheburkova, A. F., & Torgalo, E. O. 2019. Peculiarities of interregional interaction in the brain of soldiers with craniocerebral injuries during testing of visual working memory for complex stimuli. Herald of Cherkasy University. Series: Biological Sciences, (1), 91-102.
Gold, J. I., & Shadlen, M. N. 2007. The neural basis of decision making. Annual review of neuroscience, 30(1), 535-574.
Rozenbaum, D. A. 2010. Human movement control (2nd ed.). Boston, Elsevier Academic Press.
Kutsenko Т. 2017. Interhemispheric transfer of information in performance of complex Stroop test involving spatial properties by right- and left-handers. Cherkasy university bulletin: biological sciences series, 1, 37-47
Sperry, R. W. 1980. Mind-brain interaction: Mentalism, yes; dualism, no. Neuroscience, 5(2), 195-206.
Maurer, C., Mergner, T., & Peterka, R. J. 2006. Multisensory control of human upright stance. Experimental brain research, 171(2), 231-250.
Kalnysh V. V, Shvets A. V, Maltsev O. V. 2018. Peculiarities of assessment and forecasting of spontaneous recovery of psychophysiological functions of combatants. Ukr J Occup Med, 2(55), 29-39, doi.org/10.33573/ujoh2018.02.029
Schubert, T., & Szameitat, A. J. 2003. Functional neuroanatomy of interference in overlapping dual tasks: an fMRI study. Cognitive Brain Research, 17(3), 733-746.
Hiraga, C. Y., Garry, M. I., Carson, R. G., & Summers, J. J. 2009. Dual-task interference: attentional and neurophysiological influences. Behavioural brain research, 205(1), 10-18.
Ivanitsky, A.M., Portnova, G.V., Martynova, O.V. [etc.]. 2013. Mapping the brain in verbal and spatial thinking. Journal of Higher Nervous Activity of human, 63(6), 677-686.
Korobeinikov, H., Prystupa, Ye., Korobeinikova, L., Briskin, Yu. 2013. Assessment of psychophysiological states in sport. Lviv: LDUFK, 312