Financial Incentive does not Affect P300 in the Complex Trial Protocol (CTP) Version in Concealed Information Test (CIT) in Malingering DetectionUninstructed Subjects

Main Article Content

J. P. Rosenfeld
E. D. Davydova
E. Labkovsky
A. Ward


Introduction.Well-known research showed that the skin conductance response (SCR) of the Autonomic Nervous System (ANS) in the Concealed Information Test (CIT) is typically increased in participants who are financially and motivationally incentivized to beat the CIT (the paradoxical “motivational impairment” effect). This is not what happens with Reaction Time (RT)-based CITs, P300 CITs based on the 3-stimulus protocol, nor on the P300-based complex trial protocol for detection of malingering.

In the Concealed Information Test (CIT), there are at least two kinds of stimuli randomly presented regarding order to participants: The (1) probes are the items expected to be remembered; they are often from a crime scene in a forensic scenario—such as, a stolen diamond necklace. The (2) irrelevant stimuli are other comparably valuable items (a watch, a bracelet, a broach, etc.) which are from the same category as the probe (jewelry), but are not identical to it, so are unrecognized by the thief as the stolen item. The probe is recognized, and therefore elicits a larger physiological response in only the knowledgeable participant. To innocent suspects, the probe is just another irrelevant so elicits a smaller or no physiological response.

Purpose. To determine how financial compensation affect P300 in the Complex Trial Protocol (CTP) Version in Concealed Information Test (CIT) in malingering detection.

Methods. P300 measured P300 peak to the subsequent negative peak {“peak to peak”) from Fz, Cz, and Pz, was recorded, filtered, artifacted, and averaged.

Signals were passed through a Mitsar 19 channel (model 201) amplifier with a.16 Hz high pass filter setting, and low pass filters at 30 Hz. Output was conveyed to a 16-bit Mitsar Analog to Digital converter sampling at 500 Hz. For analyses and displays, single sweeps and averages were digitally filtered; the filter passed frequencies from 0 to 6 Hz using a Kaiser filtering algorithm.

The present report study of motivated malingerers instructed how to beat the test, with uninstructed motivated (paid and unpaid) and unmotivated (“simple malingering”) subjects, using episodic and semantic memory probes. The Test of Memory Malingering (TOMM) validated behavioral differences among groups.

Results.The present reports found the lack of financially motivated influence with both episodic and semantic memory stimuli.

Also semantic memory-evoked P300s exceeded episodic memory evoked P300s. An effect of specific test-beating instructions was found to enhance the CIT effect for semantic information.

Originality. The “Concealed Information Test (CIT) effect” (probe-minus-irrelevant P300 differences) did not differ among incentive groups.

Conclution.P300 amplitude is associated with the amount of focused attention to stimuli. This suggests that since a financial incentive should increase attention, the incentive manipulation should also produce larger P300s to familiar stimuli. However, once attention is enough to assure recognition of probes within a memory type category, the resulting P300s consequently generated in a more all-or-none manner are no longer influenced by motivation. Apparently, in the present study, attention to stimuli was adequate to assure recognition, whose consequent P300s, were no longer modifiable by motivation.

Article Details



Rosenfeld, JP, Labkovsky, E, Davydova, E, Ward, AC, & Rosenfeld, L. (2017). Financial incentive does not affect P300 (in response to certain episodic and semantic probe stimuli) in the Complex Trial Protocol (CTP) version of the Concealed Information Test (CIT) in detection of malingering. Psychophysiology. V. 54. P.764–772. doi: 10.1111/psyp.12835

Rosenfeld, JP, Labkovsky, E, Davydova, E, & Ward, A. (2016). Financial incentive (motivation) has no effect on P300-based CTP performance. In: 28th Annual Meeting of American Psychological Society, Chicago, IL.

Lykken, DT. (1959). The GSR in the detection of guilt. Journal of Applied Psychology. V. 43. P. 385. doi: 10.1037/h0046060

Verschuere, B, Ben Shakhar, G, Meijer, E (eds). (2011). Memory Detection: Theory and Application of the Concealed Information Test. P. 63–89. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press

Meije,r EH, Selle, NK, Elber, L, & Ben-Shakhar, G. (2014). Memory detection with the concealed information test: a meta analysis of skin conductance, respiration, heart rate, and P300 data. Psychophysiology.V. 51. P. 879–904. doi: 10.1111/psyp.12239

Rosenfeld, JP, Ben Shakhar, G, & Ganis, G. (2012). Physiologically based methods of concealed memory detection. Chapter 10. In: Sinnott-Armstrong W, Schauer FD, Nadel L, editor. Memory and Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press

Rosenfeld, JP. (2011). P300 in detecting concealed information. In: Verschuere B, Ben Shakhar G, Meijer E, editors. Memory Detection:Theory and Application of the Concealed Information Test.P. 63–89. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511975196.005

Labkovsky, E, & Rosenfeld, JP.(2014). A novel dual probe complex trial protocol for detection of concealed information: superiority of pictorial vs. verbal presentation. Psychophysiology.V. 51. P. 1122–1130. doi: 10.1111/ psyp.12258

Kleinberg, B, & Verschuere, B. (2016). The role of motivation to avoid detection in reaction time-based concealed information detection. Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition. V. 5. P. 43–51. doi: 10.1016/j.jarmac.2015.11.004

Suchotzk,i K, Verschuere, B, Crombez, G, & De Houwer, J. (2013). Reaction time measures in deception research: comparing the effects of irrelevant and relevant stimulus–response compatibility. Acta psychologica. V. 144. P. 224–231. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2013.06.014

Suchotzki, K, Verschuere, B, Van Bockstaele, B, Ben-Shakhar, G, & Crombez, G. (2017). Lying takes time: a meta-analysis on reaction time measures of deception. Psychological Bulletin. V. 143. P. 428–453. doi: 10.1037/bul0000087

Ellwanger, J, Rosenfeld, JP, Sweet, JJ, & Bhatt M. (1996). Detecting simulated amnesia for autobiographical and recently learned information using the P300 event-related potential. International Journal of Psychophysiology. V. 23. P. 9–23. doi: 10.1016/0167-8760(96)00035-9

Rosenfeld, JP, Ellwanger, J, & Sweet, J. (1995). Detecting simulated amnesia with event-related brain potentials. International Journal of Psychophysiology. V. 19. P. 1–11. doi: 10.1016/0167-8760(94)00057-L

van Hooff, JC, Sargeant, E, Foster, JK, & Schmand, BA. (2009). Identifying deliberate attempts to fake memory impairment through the combined use of reaction time and event-related potential measures. International Journal of Psychophysiology. V. 73. P. 246–256. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2009.04.002

Rosenfeld, JP, Ellwanger, JW, Nolan, K, Wu, S, Bermann, RG, & Sweet, J. (1999). P300 scalp amplitude distribution as an index of deception in a simulated cognitive deficit model. International Journal of Psychophysiology. V. 33. P. 3–19. doi: 10.1016/S0167-8760(99)00021-5

Rosenfeld, JP, Sweet, JJ, Chuang, J, Ellwanger, J, & Song, L. (1996). Detection of simulated malingering using forced choice recognition enhanced with event-related potential recording. Clinical Neuropsychology. V. 10. P. 163–179. doi: 10.1080/13854049608406678

Rosenfeld, JP, Labkovsky, E, Winograd, M, Lui, AM, Vandenboom, C, et al. (2008). The Complex Trial Protocol (CTP): a new, countermeasure-resistant, accurate P300-based method for detection of concealed information. Psychophysiology.V. 45. P. 906–919. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8986.2008.00708.x

Tombaugh, TN. (1996). Test of Memory Malingering: TOMM. New York, NY: MHS

Sweet, JJ, Benson, LM, Nelson, NW, & Moberg PJ. (2015). The American academy of clinical neuropsychology, national academy of neuropsychology, and society for clinical neuropsychology (APA Division 40) 2015 TCN professional practice and ‘salary survey’: professional practices, beliefs, and incomes of US neuropsychologists. Clinical Neuropsychology. V. 29. P. 1069–1162. doi: 10.1080/13854046.2016.1140228

Martin, PK, Schroeder, RW, & Odland, AP. (2015). Neuropsychologists’ validity testing beliefs and practices: a survey of North American professionals. Clinical Neuropsychology. V. 29. P. 741–776. doi: 10.1080/13854046.2015.1087597

Donchin, E, Kramer, A, & Wickens, C. (1986). Applications of brain event related potentials to problems in engineering psychology. In: Coles M, Porges S, Donchin E, editors. Psychophysiology: Systems, Processes and Applications. P. 702–710. New York, NY: Guilford

Polich, J. (2007). Updating P300: an integrative theory of P3a and P3b. Clinical Neuropsychology. V. 118. P. 2128–2148. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2007.04.019

Rees, LM, Tombaugh, TN, Gansler, DA, & Moczynski, NP. (1998). Five validation experiments of the Test of Memory Malingering (TOMM). Psychological Assessment. V. 10. P. 10. doi: 10.1037/1040-3590.10.1.10

Weinborn, M, Orr, T, Woods, SP, Conover E, & Feix, J. (2003). A validation of the test of memory malingering in a forensic psychiatric setting. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology.V. 25. P. 979–990. doi: 10.1076/jcen.25.7.979. 16481

Teichner, G, & Wagner, MT. (2004). The Test of Memory Malingering (TOMM): normative data from cognitively intact, cognitively impaired, and elderly patients with dementia. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology. V. 19. P. 455–464. doi: 10.1016/S0887-6177(03)00078-7

Hilsabeck, RC, Gordon, SN, Hietpas-Wilson, T, & Zartman, AL. (2011). Use of trial 1 of the Test of Memory Malingering (TOMM) as a screening measure of effort: suggested discontinuation rules. Clinical Neuropsychology.V. 25. P. 1228–1238. doi: 10.1080/13854046.2011. 589409

Soskins, M, Rosenfeld, JP, & Niendam, T. (2001). The case for peak-to-peak measurement of P300 recorded at.3 hz high pass filter settings in detection ofdeception. International Journal of Psychophysiology. V. 40. P. 173–180. doi: 10.1016/S0167-8760(00)0 0154-9

Rosenfeld, JP, Ward, A, Frigo, V, Drapekin, J, & Labkovsky, E. (2015). Evidence suggesting superiority of visual (verbal) vs. auditory test presentation modality in the P300-based, Complex Trial Protocol for concealed autobiographical memory detection. International Journal of Psychophysiology. V. 96. P. 16–22. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2015.02.026

Semlitsch, HV, Andere,r P, Schuster, P, & Presslich, O. (1986). A solution for reliable and valid reduction of ocular artifacts, applied to the P300 ERP. Psychophysiology. V. 23. P. 695–703. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8986.1986.tb00696.x

Meijer, EH, Smulders, FT, Merckelbach, HL, & Wolf, AG. (2007). The P300 is sensitive to concealed face recognition. International Journal of Psychophysiology.V. 66. P. 231–237. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2007.08.001

Keil, A, Debener, S, Gratton, G, Junghöfer, M, Kappenman, ES, Luck, SJ, et al.(2014). Committee report: publication guidelines and recommendations for studies using electroencephalography and magnetoencephalography. Psychophysiology. V. 51. P. 1–21. doi: 10.1111/psyp.12147

Efron B, Tibshirani RJ. (1994). An Introduction to the Bootstrap. Berlin: CRC press

Cohen J. (1969). Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioural Sciences. New York, NY: Academic Press

Richardson, JT. (2011). Eta squared and partial eta squared as measures of effect size in educational research. Educational Research Review V. 6. P. 135–147. doi: 10.1016/j.edurev.2010.12.001

Rouder, JN, Speckman, PL, Sun, D, Morey, RD, & Iverson, G. (2009). Bayesian t-tests for accepting and rejecting the null hypothesis. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review. V. 16. P. 225–237. doi: 10.3758/PBR.16.2.225

Jeffreys, H. (1961). The Theory of Probability. Oxford: Oxford University Press

Schönbrodt, FD, Wagenmakers, EJ, Zehetleitner, M, & Perugini, M. (2017). Sequential hypothesis testing with Bayes factors: efficiently testing mean differences. Psychological Methods. V. 22. P. 322. doi: 10.1037/met00 00061

Kass, RE, Raferty, AE. (1995). Bayes factors. Journal of the American Statistical Association.V. 90. P. 377–395. doi: 10.1080/01621459.1995.10476572

Seymour, TL, Seifert, CM, Shafto, MG, & Mosmann, AL. (2000). Using response time measures to assess “guilty knowledge”. Journal of Applied Psychology. V. 85. P. 30–37. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.85.1.30

Rosenfeld, JP, Hu, X, Labkovsky, E, Meixner, J, & Winograd, M. (2013). Review of recent studies and issues regarding the P300-based, complex trial protocol for detection of concealed information. International Journal of Psychophysiology. V. 90. P. 118–134. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2013.08.012

klein Selle, N, Verschuere, B, Kindt, M, Meijer, E, & Ben-Shakhar, G. (2015). Orienting versus inhibition in the concealed information test: different cognitive mechanisms drive different physiological measures. Psychophysiology. V. 53. P. 579–590.doi: 10.1111/psyp. 12583

Johnson, R. (1988). The amplitude of the P300 component of the event-related potential: Review and synthesis. Advances in Psychophysiology. V. 3. P. 69–137.

Sweet, JJ. (1999). Malingering. Forensic Neuropsychology: Fundamentals and Practice. P. 255–273. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.

Rosenfeld, JP, Sitar, E, Wasserman, JD, & Ward, AC. (2018). Moderate financial incentive does not appear to influence the P300 Concealed Information Test (CIT) effect in the Complex Trial Protocol (CTP) version of the CIT in a forensic scenario, while affecting P300 peak latencies and behavior. International Journal of Psychophysiology. V. 125. P. 42–49. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2018. 02.006

Tulving, E. (1972). Episodic and semantic memory. Org Mem. V. 1. P. 381–403.

Rosenfeld, JP, Ward, A, Wasserman, JD, Sitar, E, & Davydova, E. (2018). Effects of motivational manipulations on the P300-based complex trial protocol for concealed information detection. In: Rosenfeld JP, editor. Detecting Concealed Information and Deception: Recent Developments. London: Academic Press/Elsevier

Elaad, E, & Ben-Shakhar, G. (1989). Effects of motivation and verbal response type on psychophysiological detection of information. Psychophysiology. V. 26. P. 442–451. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8986.1989.tb01950.x