Current trends in the genus Amelanchier Medik. system improvement

O. D. Andriyenko, O. A. Opalko, A. I. Opalko


Introduction. Cultivated representatives of Amelanchier spp. (Juneberry) in Ukraine belong to unconventional, but valuable fruit and ornamental plants. This determines the topicality of analyzing the current state of taxonomic and systematic studies of the genus Amelanchier Medik. presented in the article. The reasons that complicate the identification of the plants as well as the structure of the genus and aspects of sorting species that emerged with the development of molecular systematics, are discussed.

Purpose. To specify the taxonomic composition of the genus Amelanchier representatives, and to analyze current views on the systematic position of these plants in the genus system and make  lists of their synonymous names used in botanics.

Methods. The method of group selection of analyzing the sources of scientific literature  using citing criteria in peer-reviewed publications and giving priority to research that is carried out by international programs.

Results. Concerning the relative stability of the placement of Amelanchier representatives within the main taxa of higher rank, the place of the genus within the particular subfamily, namely: within the subfamily Pyroideae (former Maloideae) or in the subfamily Amygdaloideae, uniting former subfamilies Amygdaloideae, Spiraeoideae and Maloideae, remains debatable. Analysis of available publications and electronic databases on the taxonomy of species Amelanchier allowed to state the tendency of decreasing the number of recognized species of the accepted genus status in the lists of the genus composition.

Originality. Tendencies, concerning specifying the status of the species that once belonged to the genus Amelanchier, indicate changing views on the taxonomy of the Juneberry in the perspective of a certain concept, in particular the transition from monotypic to polytypic species concept, when a certain amount (one-two) of distinctive features, at a more detailed study, are the manifestation of variability in the species to adapt to environmental factors.

Conclusion. Found in various publications, differences on species and intraspecies classification of Amelanchier spp. indicate the incompleteness of the genus system and the necessity for further research using both the newest, including molecular and genetic, and traditional methods.


agamospecies; molecular systematics; DNA sequence; microspecies; non-traditional crops; subfamily; horticulture; species status; tribe Maleae


Opalko, A. I., Andriyenko, O. D., & Opalko, O. A. (2014). Disputable issues of the genus Amelanchier Medik. taxonomy. Plodovi, likars'ki, tekhnichni, dekoratyvni roslyny: aktual'ni pytannya introduktsiyi, biolohiyi, selektsiyi, tekhnolohiyi kul'tyvuvannya (Pam"yati vydatnoho vchenoho, akademika M.F. Kashchenka i 100-richchyu zasnuvannya Aklimatyzatsiynoho sadu): materialy Mizhnarodnoyi naukovo-praktychnoyi zaochnoyi konferentsiyi (Kyyiv, 4 veresnya 2014 roku)(Fruit, medicinal, industrial, ornamental plants: current issues of introduction, biology, breeding, cultivation technology in memory of distinguished scientist, academician N. F. Kaschenko and to 100-th anniversary of the foundation of Acclimatization Garden: Proceedings of the International Scientiic and Practical Distant Conference 4 September 2014, Kyiv, Ukraine), Kyiv, 191–195 (in Ukr.)

Campbell, C. S., & Wright, W. A. (1996). Apomixis, hybridization, and taxonomic complexity in eastern North American Amelanchier (Rosaceae). Folia Geobotanica and Phytotaxonomica, 31, 3, 345–354.

Jones, G. N. (1946). American species of Amelanchier. Illinois biological monographs, 20, 2.

Antonov, A. S. (2002). Genomics and Genosystematics. Russian Journal of Genetics, 38, 6, 622−627.

Opalko, A. I., Kucher, N. M., & Opalko О. A. (2012). Phylogeny and phytogeography pome fruits. Avtokhtonni ta introdukovani roslyny (Autochthonous and alien plants), 8, 35–44 (in Ukr.)

L’Obel, de Matthias (1581). Amelanchier. In L’Obel, de Matthias. Kruydtboeck oft beschrÿuinghe van allerleye ghewassen, kruyderen, hesteren, ende gheboomten. T’Antwerpen: By Christoffel Plantyn, 223.

Medicus, F. C. (1789). 346. Amelanchier. In Medicus, F. C. Philosophische Botanik: mit kritischen Bemerkungen. Von den mannigfaltigen Umhüllungen der Saamen. Mannheim, 1, 135.

Tournefort, J. P. (1700). Genus II. Mefpilus Neflier. In Tournefort, J. P. Institutiones rei herbariæ. Parisiis: E Typographia Regia, 1, 641–642.

Linné, C. (1767). 625. Mespilus. Cal. In Linné, C. Systema naturae: per regna tria natura, secundum classes, ordines, genera, species, cum characteribus, differentiis, synonymis, locis. Holmiae: L. Salvii, 2 Regnum vegetabile. 343.

Chernik, V. V., Dzhus, M. A., & Sautkina, T. A. (2010). Angiosperms. Dicotyledonous class. In: Chernik, V. V., Dzhus, M. A., Sautkina,T. A. Minsk, 203–212 (in Rus.)

Aldasoro, J. J., Aedo, С., & Navarro, С. (2005). Phylogenetic and phytogeographical relationships in Maloideae (Rosaceae) based on morphological and anatomical characters. Blumea, 50, 1, 3–32.

Angiosperm Phylogeny Group (2009). An update of the Angiosperm Phylogeny Group classification for the orders and families of flowering plants: APG III. Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society, 161, 105–121.

Campbell, C. S., Evans, R. C., & Morgan, D. R. (2007). Phylogeny of subtribe Pyrinae (formerly the Maloideae, Rosaceae): Limited resolution of a complex evolutionary history. Plant systematics and evolution, 266, 1–2, 119–145.

Engler, А. (1903). Syllabus der Pflanzenfamilien. Eine Übersicht über das gesamte Pflanzensystem mit Berücksichtigung der Medicinal- und Nutzpflanzen nebst einer Übersieht über die Florenreiehe und Florengebiete der Erde zum Gebrauch bei Vorlesungen und Studien über specielle und medicinisch-pharraaceutische Botanik. Berlin: Verlag von Gebrüder Borntraeger.

Opalko, A. I., Andrienko, Е. D., & Opalko, O. A. (2015). The representatives of Amelanchier Medik. genus in Ukraine. Vestnik Volgogradskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Ser. 11, Estestvennye nauki (Science Journal of Volgograd State University. Natural sciences), 1 (11), 15–33.

Takhtajan, A. L. (2009). Flowering plants. N.Y.: Springer Science+Business Media.

Gladkova, V. N. (1980). Pink, or rose family order (Rosales). In A. L. Takhtajan (Ed.). Zhizn' rastenij (Plant life). In 6 vol. Moscow, (5/2), 175–189 (in Rus.)

The Plant List is a working list of all known plant species. Version 1.1. September 2013. Retrieved from (Accessed 20 March 2015)

Sokolov, D. D., & Shipunov, A. B. (2009). Ordo Rosales  Rosales order. In А. К. Timonin (Ed.). Botanika (Botany). In 4 vol. Moscow: Publishing Center «Academy», 4 Sistematika vysshih rastenij (Systematics of higher plants), 2, 239–241 (in Rus.)

Rehder, A. (1920). New species, varieties and combinations from the herbarium and the collections of the Arnold Arboretum. Journal of the Arnold arboretum, 1, 4, 254–263.

Weber, C. (1964). The genus Chaenomeles (Rosaceae). Journal of the Arnold Arboretum, 45, 2, 161–205, continued, 45, 3, 302–345.

Phipps, J. B., Robertson, K. R., & Smith, P. G. (1990). A checklist of the subfamily Maloideae (Rosaceae). Canadian journal of botany, 68, 10, 2209–2269.

Dickinson, T. A., Lo, E. Y. Y., & Talent, N. (2007). Polyploidy, reproductive biology, and Rosaceae: understanding evolution and making classifications. Plant systematics and evolution, 266, 1–2, 59–78.

Potter, D., Eriksson, T., & Evans, R. C. (2007). Phylogeny and classification of Rosaceae. Plant systematics and evolution, 266, 1–2, 5–43.

Tsvelev, N. N. (2001). Genus 34. Juneberry — Amelanchier Medik. In N. N. Tsvelev (Ed.) Flora Vostochnoj Evropy (Flora of Eastern Europe). St. Petersburg: World and Family, 10, 552–555 (in Rus.)

International Code of Nomenclature for algae, fungi, and plants (Melbourne Code) adopted by the Eighteenth International Botanical Congress Melbourne, Australia, July 2011. Section 2. Names of families and subfamilies, tribes and subtribes. Chapter III. Nomenclature of taxa according to their rank. Article 19. Retrieved from (Accessed 12 May 2014)

Haston, E., Richardson, J. E., & Stevens, P. F. (2009). The Linear Angiosperm Phylogeny Group (LAPG) III: a linear sequence of the families in APG III. Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society, 161, 2, 128–131.

Mosyakin, S. L. (2013). Families and orders of angiosperms of the flora of Ukraine: a pragmatic classification and placement in the phylogenetic system. Ukrayins'kyy botanichnyy zhurnal (Ukrainian Botanical Journal), 70, 3, 289–307 (in Ukr.)

Catalogue of Life: 18 th March 2015. Retrieved from (Accessed 30 March 2015).

Full Text: PDF (Українська)


  • There are currently no refbacks.
2014 2 36
2015 2 19
2016 1 2
2017 1 2
2018 1 2
2019 1 2
2020 1



Journal Content